On
What Day Was He Crucified?
What Do You Mean,
“About the Sixth Hour”?
A vital key and pivotal Scripture
has been studiously ignored, misinterpreted, seriously misunderstood --and yet
it holds the VITAL KEY to the date and time
of the
crucifixion and the sequence of events
during the last few days of Jesus Christ upon this earth, before His
crucifixion! This truth exposes a glaring error of many who attempt to keep a
"Passover" at the beginning of Nisan 14 -- the very time Jesus Christ
was imprisoned by the Romans, and awaiting His crucifixion the next morning.
William F.
Dankenbring
What
difference does it make? To most people, not a whole lot.
To most people, it would merely be a matter of academic interest, because they
do not really claim to be "Christian," and to desire to live in
obedience to God's commandments, and by "every word of God"
(Matt.4:4; Luke 4:4).
To
true Christians, however, it makes a great deal of difference! Why? Because a
true understanding of the last few days of Christ on earth pinpoints the TRUTH
about when and how Christians should observe the true Passover --and it reveals
and exposes for all to see the ERROR of those who insist on changing the
Passover from its original appointed time --the end of Nisan 14 and beginning
of Nisan 15 --to a night 24 hours earlier!
A
true understanding of this one Scripture --John 19:14 --smashes forever the
very idea that Jesus Christ CHANGED the Passover ordinance, or that He observed
the "Passover" at the beginning of Nisan 14, during what most
people refer to as "the Lord's Supper" !
Is
it really possible that thousands of people have been misled? Is it really
possible that hundreds of ministers have been teaching error and falsehood
concerning the Passover, and the "Lord's supper"? Are we willing to
investigate these matters honestly, objectively? Let's carefully study into
this pivotal Scripture, and see what it really says. First, let's notice the
background, leading up to this key Scripture.
First, let us notice John's account of Christ's "last supper." Notice the striking comments that John makes concerning this final evening meal, or supper, that Jesus Christ held with His twelve disciples. As we read this account, ask yourself: "Was this The Gospel of John and the Last Supper evening meal the Passover, as some churches teach?" Now notice exactly what John declared!
"NOW BEFORE THE FEAST OF THE PASSOVER, when Jesus knew that
his
hour was come that he should depart out of this world unto the Father, having
loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end.
"And supper being ended [Greek, "supper being served" is
a better translation-- see
many new translations or any commentary or lexicon], the devil having now
put in
the
heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, to betray him; Jesus, knowing that the
Father
had
given all things into his hands, and that he was come from God, and went to
God;
He riseth from supper [ supper
was still in progress], and laid aside his [outer] garments;
and
took a towel, and girded himself. After that, he poureth water into a basin,
and
began to wash the disciples' feet, and to wipe them with
the towel wherewith he was
girded. .." (John 13:1-5).
Now plainly John says this
final "supper" was "before" the Passover! Therefore
it could not have been the "Passover"! The fact that the
"Passover" had not yet come is also proved by the fact that the Jews
were still waiting for Passover even when Jesus was later taken before
Caiaphas the high priest, and then taken to appear before Pontius Pilate (John
18:28). The next day, following the "Lord's Supper," was still called
"the preparation of the passover" (John
Therefore, when we understand it, there is
absolutely NO PROOF that the "last supper" was actually the
"Passover" itself, as so many people assume.
That conclusion has been the erroneous ASSUMPTION, of countless scholars, who believe the gospel accounts contradict themselves, and who simply assumed without proof that the "last supper" was the Passover itself. To achieve this conclusion, many scholars have claimed that this "last supper" actually occurred on the night of Nisan15, when the Jews ate the Passover. Others have claimed that it occurred on the night before Jesus' crucifixion, or the eve of Nisan 14. Both conclusion, however, are baseless, incorrect, and without Biblical basis --both are WRONG!
Jesus plainly said, "The scripture cannot be
broken" (John
The question is, then, when was this final meal Jesus held with His disciples? On what day did it occur? Was it at the beginning of Nisan 14 – after sunset? Or was it on the previous evening – the beginning of Nisan 13? How can we know for sure?
Let's pick of the rest of
the story. What happened next, that night of the "last supper"? Jesus handed the sop to Judas, who then left
the table to go and betray Him (Matt.26:25; John 13:21-30). "He then
having received the sop went immediately out: and it was night" (John
" And he took bread, and gave
thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying,
This is my
body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. Likewise
also the cup AFTER SUPPER, saying, This cup is the new testament in my
blood,
which is shed for you" (Luke
The Word “Artos”
Matthew and Mark both say that
this new ceremony was instituted " as they did
eat" (Mark
" 1. artos ...'bread, , (perhaps deri ved from aro,
'to fit to gether , ,
or
from a root ar--, 'the earth'), signifies (a) 'a small loaf or cake,'
composed of flour and water, and baked, in shape either oblong or
round, and about as thick as the thumb; these were not
cut, but broken
and
consecrated to the Lord every Sabbath and called the 'shewbread'
(loaves of presentation) ...(b) 'the loaf at
the Lord's Supper,' e.g.,
Matt.26:16 ('Jesus took a loaf,' RV, margin); the breaking of 'bread'
became the name of this institution. ..(c) 'bread of any kind,' Matt.
16:11. ..
2. azumos ...denotes 'unleavened
bread,' i.e., without any process
of fermentation; hence, metaphorically, 'of a holy,
spiritual condition,'
I Cor.5:7,
and of 'sincerity and truth' (v.8). With the article it signifies
the feast of unleavened bread" (Vine's'
Complete Expository Dictionary
of Old and New Testament Words', "Bread," page 77,
Greek portion).
The word artos generally
refers to regular BREAD, the kind that we eat throughout the year --which is
leavened (Matt.4:4; Luke 4:4). It is used of Christ who is the "bread of
life" (John
The word translated "unleavened bread" throughout the New Testament is always azumos, which simply means "unleavened."
Since the word for the
"bread" that Christ broke at the "last supper" was artos.
and there is no reference in the relevant passages at all to azumos'
("unleavened"), the implication is clear that the bread Christ
used as a symbol of His body was REGULAR LEAVENED BREAD -- similar to the
"Sabbath bread" Jewish people eat every Sabbath day in celebration of
the manna from heaven and the "bread of life" ! In this sense, "leaven " becomes a type of the Holy Spirit of God, and
the
The fact that Jesus used
ARTOS at the "Last Supper" shows that this final meal He had with His
disciples was not and could not have been a "Passover, at which
only UNLEAVENED BREAD ("AZUMOS") could be eaten!
The fact is, the "bread
and wine" ceremony which Christ used to teach His disciples the real
meaning of the "bread" and "wine" is an ancient ceremony
which goes all the way back to Melchizedek, who brought forth "bread and
wine" before Abraham (Gen.14: 18). The importance of this fact is that every
time Jewish people or any others celebrate the KIDDUSH --the "blessing of
the bread and wine" --they are in effect SHOWING THE LORD'S DEATH, whether
they realize it or not!
The apostle Paul plainly shows that this custom --which some may refer to as "Communion" --is something which ought to be celebrated and observed "OFTEN" --not once a year as an annual memorial. His exact words are: "For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: This is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.
" After the same manner also he
took the cup, when he had supped, saying, ,This
cup
is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, AS OFT AS YE DRINK IT,
in remembrance of me.
"FOR AS OFTEN AS YE EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS CUP, ye do
shew the Lord's deafh till he come" (I Cor.ll:23-26).
This ceremony or ritual has absolutely nothing directly to do with the annual PASSOVER observance, which is an altogether different observance! This is a ceremony which is to be done "OFTEN" --the Jews partake of the bread and wine every Sabbath in many synagogues. We at Triumph Ministries do this the first Sabbath of every month, besides on Holy Days and other special occasions.
The Jamieson,
Faucett, Brown Critical Experimental Commentary says of this expression as
found in I Corinthians
After Jesus concluded His final " going away" meal with His disciples, a true "love feast," as it were, a very touching, emotional dinner in which He expressed His deep love for them, over and over, He gave them the new symbolism of the "bread and wine" ceremony, by which they were to remember Him throughout the year. After this, He gave them many encouraging and comforting words.
After this final meal Jesus held with His disciples, we read, " And when they had sung an hymn, they went out into the mount of Olives" (Matt.26:30).
As they walked to the mount of Olives, Jesus told
His disciples that they would all forsake Him that night, saying, “All ye shall
be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the
shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad. But after I am risen again, I will go before you into
The last supper probably
lasted from about 6:00 PM until about 8:00 PM. Jesus then spoke His final
messages to the disciples (John 14-16), words of encouragement. He then prayed
for them, and those who would believe on Him because of their witness (John
17), a prayer that they would be protected from evil (v.15), and be united
together as one, even as He and the Father are “one” (John 17:17-23). These
final words of comfort probably were made from about
After praying in the
"Then the band and the captain and the officers of the Jews took
Jesus. and bound
him,
and led him away to ANNAS FIRST; for he was father in law to Caiaphas.
which was the high priest that same year" (John
While
standing before Annas, Peter was accused by a damsel that kept the door of
being one of Jesus' disciples, and he denied it --his first denial (John
The interrogation before
Caiaphas at his home was more extensive, and probably lasted from about
Take note of the fact that none of the false witnesses agreed with each other --the whole trial was fast becoming an obvious "set up" --and a disaster for the chief priests since no credible witness against Jesus could be found. Finally, exasperated, Caiaphas arose and demanded as high priest that Jesus tell them whether He was the Christ or not. Jesus answered in the affirmative. saying in effect that He was indeed, whereupon the high priest “rent his clothes.”
This "kangaroo court" probably took another couple of hours, that very night. This of course occurred that very same night, before .Jesus was brought to trial, which would be the next morning. Notice!
Early the next morning, Jesus was summarily brought before the ENTIRE Sanhedrin, for final summary judgment. Matthew tells us:
"WHEN THE MORNING WAS COME, all the chief priests and elders of
the
people took counsel against JESUS to put him to death: and when they had
bound Jesus, they led him away, and delivered him to Pontius Pilate the
governor" (Matthew 27:1-2).
The gospel of Mark adds:
" And straightway [IMMEDIATELY] in the morning the
chief priests held a
consultation with the elders and scribes and the WHOLE
COUNCIL, and bound
Jesus, and
carried him away, and delivered him to Pilate" (Mark 15:1).
This was the next morning --a
new day. Morning is generally considered from about
Judging by the combined gospel
accounts, it is obvious that the meeting of the Sanhedrin that condemned Christ
was held early in the morning, "the next day," which would be no
earlier than about
The Scriptures clearly state that it was already the next MORNING when the Sanhedrin gave their final decision. They then took Jesus before Pilate.
However, many assume that
Jesus must have been brought before Pilate during the night! However, that is
not what the Scriptures state. Morning is morning --not night. Remember, Pilate
was a Roman governor who had no love for Jews but was like most Romans an
anti-Semite at heart. He was an imperious, proud, arrogant Roman. How likely
would you think it would have been that he would have gotten up in the middle
of the night just to accommodate a bunch of Jewish priests and religious
leaders? Pilate was a Roman governor. For him to hold court at nighttime itself would have been CONTRARY TO ROMAN LA W!
However that may be, the Scriptures clearly state that first the Sanhedrin met together, in full assembly, "the next morning," which would have been after sunrise --no earlier. After they formally condemned Christ, they brought Him before Pontius Pilate for final sentencing.
Nevertheless, all these events
obviously took considerable TIME! The Scriptures plainly state that it was
already morning when Jesus was brought before Pilate. During the court appearance, Pilate learned that Jesus was a
Galilean and belonged to king Herod's jurisdiction.
Therefore, rather than appease the Jews clamoring for Christ's blood, Pilate
sent Him over to Herod for judgment (Luke 23:1-7). This would have taken
considerable more time.
From Pilate's audience, Jesus is remanded to the jurisdiction of Herod,
the king. This was after Pilate had heard his case, and interviewed Him. If
Pilate saw Jesus and heard the complaints of the chief priests and elders of
the people against Him about
Luke's
account goes on:
" And when Herod saw Jesus, he was exceeding glad: for he
was desirous to see
him
of a long season, because he had heard many things of him; and he hoped to
have
seen some miracle done by him. Then he questioned with him in many words;
but he answered him nothing. And the chief priests and
scribes stood and vehemently
accused him. And Herod with his men of war set him at
nought, and mocked him,
arrayed him in a gorgeous robe, and sent him again to Pilate. And the same day
Pililte and Herod were made friends together; for before they were at
enmity between
themselves" (Luke 23:8-12).
Herod probably began his "interrogation" and
"questioning," and his abuse and mistreatment of Jesus the Christ,
about 9:00 or 9:30 AM and finished by about 10:00 or 10:30 AM, when he and his
soldiers had had enough "sport" with Him, and then sent Him back to
Pilate.
Jesus
appeared before Pilate, then, a second and final time. This would have probably
been roughly about
Luke goes
on to describe what happened next in the sequence of events. Picking up the
story:
" And Pilate, when he had called
together the chief priests and the rulers and the
people, said unto them, Ye have brought this man unto me,
as one that perverteth
the
people: and, behold, I, having examined him before you, have found no fault
in this man as touching those things whereof ye accuse him. I
will therefore chastise
him and release him. (For of necessity he must release
one unto them at the feast. )
And they cried
out all at once, saying, Away with this man, and
release unto us
Barabbas: (Who for a certain sedition made in the city, and for murder.
was cast into
prison.) Pilate therefore, willing to release Jesus, spake
again to them. But they
cried, saying, Crucify him, crucify him. And he said unto
them the third time, Why,
what evil hath he done? I have found no cause of death in
him: I will therefore chastise
him,
and let him go.
" And they were instant with loud
voices, requiring that he might be crucified. And
the voices of them and of the chief priests prevailed.
And Pilate gave sentence that it
should be as they required. And he released unto them him
that for sedition and
murder was cast into prison, whom they had desired; but he
delivered Jesus to their
will" (Luke
Pilate was really in a spot. Yet, being weak-willed and shallow in
character, he supinely caved in before the Jewish mob, the chief priests,
scribes and Pharisees, and all the enemies of Jesus who were jealous and
envious of Him.
Now, when did this final appearance before Pilate occur? When was it
that Jesus was finally condemned to death, and taken by the Roman soldiers to
be whipped, scourged, and tortured, and later to be crucified?
John 19 --The
KEY to Understanding
We read in
the gospel of John the following record of events:
"Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus
answered, Thou
sayest that I am a King. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I
into
the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth.
Every one that is of the truth
heareth my voice.
"Pilate saith unto him, What is truth? And
when he had said this, he went out again
unto the Jews, and saith unto them, I find in him no
fault at all. But ye have a custom,
that I should release unto you one at the passover: will
ye therefore that I release unto
you the King of the Jews? Then cried they all again,
saying, Not this man, but Barabbas.
Now Barabbas was a robber" (John
"Then Pilate therefore took Jesus, and scourged him. And the
soldiers plaited a crown
of thorns, and put it on his head, and they put on him
a purple robe, and said, Hail,
King of the
Jews! and they smote him with their hands. ,
"Pilate therefore went forth again, and saith unto them, Behold, I bring him forth to you,
that ye may know that I find no fault in him. Then came
Jesus forth wearing the crown
of thorns, and the purple robe. And Pilate said, Behold
the man!
"When the chief priests therefore and officers saw him, they cried
out, saying, Crucify him, crucify him. Pilate saith
unto them, Take ye him, and crucify him: for I find no
fault in him" (John 19:1-6).
Pilate sought to release Jesus, but his attempts were to no avail. The
Jews were vehement, and insisted that Jesus had to be crucified, and put to
death. Pilate knew that Jesus was an innocent man. John goes on:
" And from thenceforth Pilate sought to release him: but
the Jews cried out, saying,
If thou let
this man go, thou art not Caesar's friend: whosoever maketh himself a
King speaketh against Caesar. When Pilate therefore heard that saying,
he brought
Jesus forth, and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called
the Pavement,
but in the Hebrew, Gabbatha" {John
Now
exactly when did these events occur?
Notice carefully!
“And it was
the preparation of the passover, AND ABOUT THE SIXTHHOUR:
and he said unto them, Behold your King!” (John 19:14).
Notice! John tells us “it was
the preparation of the Passover.” This plainly tells us that the
Passover was not yet --it had not yet arrived! Notice also! John does
NOT say “it was the preparation DAY” of the Passover. He does not use the word
“day” at all. Therefore, he is telling us that this was done during the
preparation period of time before the Passover itself. The Passover was slain
on Nisan 14, "between the two evenings" (Exo.12:6), or late afternoon
on Nisan 14. However, the Passover lambs were selected on Nisan 10 and kept up
until Nisan 14 (Exodus 12:3-6) -- therefore, all these days from Nisan 10-14
belonged to the time of preparation.
In this verse, John is not telling us it was Nisan 14, the day the lambs were killed --but rather the "preparation" period before that final event. It could not have been the final day of "preparation," that is Nisan 14 itself, for reasons we shall soon see.
The actual Greek of this verse states" "And it was preparation of the Passover, hour and about (the) sixth, and he says to the Jews, Behold the king of you." Notice that there is no article "the" before the word "preparation." Thus this was referring to the time of preparation, not to a particular day itself!
The time Jesus appeared
before Pontius Pilate the final time was "about the sixth hour." What
time of day was this? Rather than conjure up human opinions, let us let the
Bible itself do the talking and explaining. What does Scripture itself say
about the definition of the expression "the sixth hour"?
This is crucial. Many
believe that this event's timing was based on ROMAN time, and that this final
appearance of Christ before Pilate occurred at
However, we have already shown that such a scenario is absolutely IMPOSSIBLE! You cannot logically compress all the events of that previous night and morning --the appearance of Christ before Annas, and Caiaphas, and in the morning the full Sanhedrin, and then Pilate the first time, and then Herod, and then Pilate once again, the second time --all before 6 A.M. in the MORNING! That is utter rubbish and preposterous nonsense! As the old expression goes, "Give me a break!"
Certain churches --such as Worldwide, United, Global,
Since Christ was already
nailed to the stake at the third hour, or
But notice even further. We
read that while Christ was hanging on the stake or tree, "And when the
SIXTH HOUR [
Judging from the crucifixion account itself, we see that the "sixth hour" clearly refers to NOON-TIME! Since Christ was on the cross at the "sixth hour," on the day of His crucifixion, therefore the "sixth hour" when He made His final appearance before Pilate had of necessity to be on the PREVIOUS DAY! Since He was crucified on Nisan 14, the very day the Jews were killing their Passover lambs, and died at the very time in the afternoon when the Passover lambs were being slain, then the “sixth hour” when He appeared before Pilate for final sentencing had to be the "sixth hour" of Nisan 13 --the previous day!
This means that the
"Last Supper," or final meal Jesus had with His disciples, had to be
the previous evening --that is, during the beginning hours of Nisan 13 --and
NOT Nisan 14, as so many churches and ministers claim! Therefore,
when such people hold their “Passover” at the beginning of Nisan 14, basing it
on the "Last Supper" Jesus held with His disciples, they are
INCORRECT! They are holding their "Passover" 24 hours' BEFORE
THE JEWS, and 24 hours AFTER the true time of the "Last
Supper"! Either way, therefore, they are IN GROSS ERROR!
How JOHN Used the Expression "The Sixth Hour"
But does the expression
"the sixth hour" in the Bible always mean
What about it? John was a
devout Jew. When he referred to time, and the hour of the day, he always used
the common Hebrew counting system --the Jewish time system. Throughout the book
of John itself, John always uses Jewish time reckoning of the hours of the day,
and the term "sixth hour" to refer to
Let us go through the book of John, in case after case, chronologically, and see how he reckons “time.”
First, notice that when John the Baptist told his
disciples that Jesus was the Lamb of God (John
" And he saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw
where he dwelt, and
abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth
hour" (John I :38-39).
When was
the "tenth hour"? Says noted New Testament conservative scholar F. F.
Bruce in his book The Gospel of John:
"The 'tenth hour' (reckoning from sunrise) was about
to
leave their work for the day" (p.56).
F. F.
Bruce in a footnote reference to this time, at the end of the chapter, explains
why this is the correct interpretation. He asserts:
"Some writers say that John followed the Roman' reckoning and
counted the hours
from
Pliny says is
that the Romans (like the Egyptians) defined the civil day as lasting
from
daylight (from sunrise to sunset) into twelve hours, and
the period of darkness (from
sunset to sunrise) into four watches" (p.66).
Notice!
The truth is, the Romans themselves also divided the "day" into
twelve hours, beginning the count from sunrise or daybreak!
In chapter
4, we read the story where Jesus met a Samaritan woman at a well in Sychar,
between
"He [Jesus] left
of
ground that Jacob gave to his son Joseph. Now Jacob's well was there. Jesus
therefore,
being wearied with his journey, sat thus on the well: and
it was ABOUT THE SIXTH
HOUR. There cometh a woman of
After walking all morning, Jesus stopped at Jacob's well in
"
therefore, who wished to go from
with
its largely Gentile population. Jesus on this occasion took the direct
route from south to north. . . .
"The sixth hour, reckoned from sunrise, would have been
time
of the day for a weary traveller to seek rest and refreshment" (Bruce,
The Gospel of John, p.101-102).
Later on, in this same chapter, Jesus healed the son of a nobleman,
without even visiting the child (John
”Then inquired they of them the hour when he began to mend. And they said
unto him, Yesterday at the seventh hour the fever
left him. So the father knew
that
it was the at the same hour, in the which Jesus said unto him, Thy son liveth:
and himself believed, and his whole house" (John
When was
the "seventh hour"? F. F. Bruce says:
“The cure had taken place suddenly, at the seventh hour --that is, about
Probably the father could have got home the same day, but his confidence
in Jesus'
word
was so strong that all anxiety left him and instead of hurrying home he com-
pleted some other convenient business" (The Gospel
of John, p.118-119).
It should be obvious that John in his gospel consistently used Hebrew
time reckoning. Therefore, for consistency's sake, when John used the
expression, "the sixth hour," in John
Scholar F.
F.Bruce has a very important commentary on the expression "the sixth
hour" in John 19:14. He writes:
" As for the time of day, it was getting on towards
arguments, no evidence is forthcoming that at this time, whether among
Romans, Greeks
or Jews, hours were EVER reckoned otherwise than from
F. F.
Bruce concludes, saying:
" And in the fact that these words
were spoken towards
Eve he implies something else: Jesus is the true paschal lamb, about
to suffer
death at the appropriate hour of the appropriate day for the life of his
people"
(p.365).
There is simply no evidence that John ever used anything but
" Jewish time" in his reckoning in his gospel, which is in many
respects the most "Jewish" of all the four gospels! There is no
evidence whatsoever to support any other interpretation of "the sixth
hour" as being anything but "
Furthermore, John himself quotes Jesus as saying, "
Are there not TWELVE HOURS IN THE DAY" (John 11:9). Thus in a
normal day-time portion of a day, there are twelve hours between sunrise and
sunset. Since the first hour would begin at sunrise, the sixth hour of a
twelve hour day would have to begin at
The daylight portion of a day, or "DAYTIME," begins at dawn,
and ends at sunset --a period of about 12 hours. The first hour would be at
dawn (about
John
himself knew this --and he used God's time --Biblical time --Jewish time --when
he referred to the "sixth hour."
Think about what this means! The "SIXTH HOUR" when Jesus was
condemned by Pontius Pilate to be crucified, had to be about NOON-TIME ON NISAN
13, the day before the crucifixion occurred! It could not have been
The Parable of the Vineyard
Now notice! Here is clinching proof that the "sixth hour"
refers to noon-time. Jesus gave a parable about a man who hired others to work
in his vineyard. Notice how time was reckoned by Jesus Christ, Yeshua the Messiah
Himself, in the story:
"For the
kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an
householder, which went
out early in the morning to hire laborers for his vineyard. And when he
had agreed with the laborers for a penny a day, he sent
them into his vineyard.
And he went out about the THIRD HOUR [
idle in the marketplace. And said unto them, Go ye also
into the vineyard, and
whatsoever is right I will give you. And they went their way.
Again he went
out ABOUT THE SIXTH [
likewise.
" And about the ELEVENTH HOUR [
standing idle, and saith unto them, Why stand ye here all
the day idle? They say
unto him, Because no man hath hired us. He saith unto
them, Go ye also into the
vineyard: and whatsoever is right, that shall ye
receive" (Matt.20: 1- 7).
Jesus Christ Himself then explains the true meaning of the "sixth
hour" to us. In this passage, He clearly points out that according to the
customary Jewish reckoning, which He Himself used, the
"third hour" refers to the third hour of the day, which would be
These facts really should not be difficult to understand. So why do so
many people stumble, and fall flat on their face, when it comes to
understanding this simple, clear Scripture? Could it be that they simply are
stubborn, and refuse to admit that they are wrong? Are they so wedded to
observing some kind of "Passover" or "Lord's Supper" or
religious observance of some kind, on the eve or beginning of Nisan 14, that they refuse to separate from it, and cling to it as
if it were a "baby" they refuse to part with?
The expression "SIXTH HOUR" clearly refers to HIGH NOON! Jesus
appeared before Pontius Pilate for His final sentencing about
Understanding
this, the whole problem is solved, and there is no contradiction left! Every
piece of the puzzle fits snugly and perfectly --like hand-in-glove.
How Much Do YOU Value the TRUTH?
I know this new truth must seem shocking, incredible, mind-boggling, to
many. But we cannot deny the facts! Even when new truth is explosive in nature
--we must be willing to accept the truth, love the truth, and embrace the
truth!
Many have taken for granted for decades that the Last Supper was on the
evening of Nisan 13, after sunset, when Nisan 14 began. They have assumed this
was the case. They have been taught this. And they have observed this date and
time for years and years, as the appropriate time for the "Last
Supper," "communion," or their so-called "New Testament
Passover." They simply didn't know any better.
However, as we have seen, the solid evidence from the New Testament
itself puts the LIE to this custom and practice. The last supper could not have
occurred on Nisan 14 at all. It had to be in the evening of the beginning of
Nisan 13. The next day, on the daylight portion of Nisan 13, at high noon,
Jesus was standing before the judgment seat of Pontius Pilate for the final
time. That evening of Nisan 13, and the beginning of Nisan 14, He was in the
Roman dungeon, having been beaten, whipped, and scourged massively by Roman
soldiers --a whole "band" of them, numbering as many as 600 men.
If we count the time from Jesus' abduction by the armed guard of the
Jewish leaders, from about about 11:00 PM of Nisan 13, till His final agony on
the stake at 3:00 PM in the afternoon of Nisan 14, when He died, we have a
total of 40 hours that He suffered --40 hours of imprisonment, judgment,
trial, mocking, buffeting, lashing, whipping, scourging, and painful waiting
for final crucifixion.
Can we begin to even imagine it? No wonder Isaiah prophesied of the
Messiah: "As many were astonied at thee; his visage was so marred more
than any man, and his form more than the sons of men: So shall he sprinkle many
nations; the kings shall shut their mouths at him: for that which had not been
told them shall they see; and that which they had not heard shall they
consider" (Isaiah 52: 14-15). No wonder Isaiah foretold, "He is
despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and
we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him
stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. But he was wounded for our
transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our
peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed" (Isaiah 53:3-5).
As Jesus
said, "Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free"
(John
On What Day Was Jesus
Condemned to Death?
Many believe that Jesus was tried, judged,
condemned and put to
death --all on the same day --that is on the day of
the crucifixion Yet the Gospel of Mark says He was nailed to the stake at
William F Dankenbring
Those who believe that Jesus had His
last supper with His disciples at the beginnmg of Nisan 14, and that He was
arrested that night, and condemned by the full Sanhedrin the next morning
--Nisan 14 --and then also condemned by Pontius Pilate on the same day --have a
very serious problem with the truth Why? Because, according to Jewish law, the
Sanhedrin of the Jewish high court was prohibited from both judging
and condemning a man on the same day! That is to say, in a capital case,
where the death penalty was going to be issued, the court by law had to hear
the case and render judgment on one day, but the execution had to occur
on the following day! This was an iron-clad rule of Jewish jurisprudence The Mishnah
states in very plain language regarding the Sanhedrin:
“In property cases they try the case by day and complete it by
night. “In
capital cases, they try the case by day, and complete it [by] day.
"In
property cases they come to a final decision on the same day [as the trial
itself],whether it is for acquittal or
conviction. In capital cases they come
to a final decision for acquittal on the same day, BUT ON THE FOLLOWING DAY
FOR CONVICTION" (Sanhedrin 41, The Mishnah, a New
Translation, by Jacob Neusner, page 590).
In other words, in ancient
Therefore, it would have been absolutely
contrary to Jewish practice for the Sanhedrin to accuse, condemn, and crucify
Jesus Christ, all on one day! Such a thing was counter to their every instinct
and custom By their own standards of judicial
practice, they stipulated in the very Mishnah that two days were required in
all capital cases where a man was determined to be "guilty," for him
to be sentenced. Therefore, since the Sanhedrin found Jesus guilty early in the
morning, soon after sunrise (see
Matt.27:1-2, Luke 22:66), they would not have been able to execute Him until
the FOLLOWING DAY!
Therefore, if Jesus Christ was brought before
the Sanhedrin on Nisan 14, by Jewish law itself, His crucifixion could not have
occurred until Nisan 15 --the next day. But this is impossible, since the Scriptures
tell us He was put to death BEFORE the high holy day --the 15th of Nisan
--arrived (see John 18:28; 19:14, 31). Jewish law would have required that they
at least hold Him over to the next day, following their determination of His
guilt, before they could carry out the sentence. But, since He was plainly
condemned on a preparation day BEFORE the high holy day,
this requires that His final appearance before the Sanhedrin be the PREVIOUS
DAY --on Nisan 13th --and that He was condemned by Pilate on Nisan 13 --and
executed the next day, on Nisan 14!